定语从句和同位语从句到底怎么区分,为什么我觉得两个从句不管怎么样都能相互解释的通?

定语从句和同位语从句到底怎么区分,为什么我觉得两个从句不管怎么样都能相互解释的通?

简单回顾一下,定语就是adj.,定语从句就是形容、修饰先行词的从句(← 戳可读)

而同位语从句的关键就在于找到先行词,再看从句是不是对它进行解释说明的。如果是,同位语从句没跑了。

归纳起来,2者跟先行词的关系是:

同位语从句:解释(啥是啥)

定语从句:定义(怎样的啥)

你试着判断下一组句子,哪个是同位语从句, 哪个是定语从句。

1)I was shocked at the fact that he died.

2)I was shocked at the fact that he told me.

定位先行词 fact。

啥事儿啊?

that he died,这件事讲的是:他狗带了

也就是说 fact = he died,两者相等,地位相同,因此是同位语从句。

同样先定位先行词 fact。

再看从句 that he told me(他告诉我)

连起来就是:他告诉我的消息

这个从句指明了是他告诉我的,而不是张三或李四那里听来的,定义了消息的来源,因此是定语从句。

再看3组句子,尝试分辨同位语从句和定语从句。

1)

The story that the book told you is true.

The story that Man has been to the moon is true.

2)

Mom made a promise that she would take us to Disneyland.

Mom made a promise that pleased us.

3)

She heard the terrible news, which brought her heart into her mouth.

She heard the terrible news that he died.

1)

看先行词 story 和 从句的关系。

从句 that the book told you(这本书所告诉你的)跟 story 怎样才能建立联系?

→ 这本书所讲的故事不是电影里看来的故事,也不是听妈妈讲的故事,从句 that the book told you 定义了先行词 story,所以是定语从句。

同上,看先行词 story 和 从句的关系。

什么故事呢?

不是《美女与野兽》,也不是《阿拉丁神灯》,而是人类跑到月亮上去的故事, story = Man has been to the moon,所以是同位语从句。

2)

3)

补充阅读:

希望对你有帮助。